← All needs

Vegan dining directory with item-level venue inclusion

This is the first time I’ve ever reviewed an app but I just had to because this app could of been amazing had this one rule be removed. I’d like to ask whats the difference in unaliving a chicken compared to lamb? We download this app because we don’t eat meat, and because it’s hard to find veggie and vegan food. But there is so many places that sell good veggie and vegan food that also serve lamb and I can’t see their establishments because of this. There is a small family owned black business that does amazing veggie wraps and I’d love for them to have a place on the app. But because they happen to sell lamb they aren’t allowed to be showed? Which means many vegans and veggies will miss out on their food. I just find this really poorly done. Why do lambs deserve more morals than chickens or pigs ? You let restaurants who sell chicken and pork be on the app but cross the line at lamb? All meat is animal cruelty not just lamb. Change this feature because I know of countless restaurants that does a good meat free option and no one can see them on the app because of this. And I as a vegetarian am missing out on finding options (the whole point of this app) because of this feature too. It just harms plant based people more than it does help them. Try finding a single restaurant that doesn’t sell lamb, that’s why there is a lack of options to eat on this app. Which is a shame since I payed £5 for this app. If you don’t want to promote lamb fair enough, but then don’t promote any places that do meat at all. Then who would buy your app? There would be nowhere to eat!